Main Article Content
This research was conducted for eight months on the island of South Kalimantan, Indonesia. This study examines Mamanda. Mamanda is a traditional South Kalimantan theater that still survives in the global era. Mamanda is liked because it is rich in humor that can entertain the entire audience and relieve fatigue because it can invite laughter. However, if it is interpreted more deeply, humor has a pragmatic function that it wants to convey to its listeners. Therefore, this study examines more deeply the function of humor in Mamanda. This study aims to describe the form and function of humor in Mamanda. This research uses the descriptive qualitative method. The data in this study, in the form of a recording of Mamanda's performance, played at the Mamanda Parade, a series of events to commemorate the anniversary of Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan. The informants in this study consisted of twenty people with different backgrounds, all of whom were players who played an active role in the show. The research method used is descriptive qualitative to describe the results in detail using a series of clear sentences. The results showed that there were four types of humor in mamanda, namely, language humor, behavioral humor, gossiping humor, and pornographic humor. The functions of humor are as a function of advising, a function of criticism, a function of satire, and a function of tolerance.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abram & Dorothy. (2010). The Trickster and the Veil: Theater, Humor, and Taboo in Creating a Compassionate Cross-Cultural Identity. International Journal of the Humanities, 8(9), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/v08i09/43017
Ahmadi, A. (2021). Teachers as Ethnographers: Narrative Study of Inquiry of Indonesian Teachers Assigned to Teach in Remote Areas. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 115-126. doi: 10.12973/EU-jer.10.1.115
Ahmadi, A. (2022). The Images of Man in Indonesian Literature: Masculinity Psychological Perspective. Masculinities & Social Change, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17583/MCS.9446
Al Shboul, O. K. (2022). Flouting of grice’s maxims by Jordanian speakers in everyday communication. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18. http://jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/3439/1004
Askildson, L. (2005). Effects of Humor in The Language Classroom: Humor as a Pedagogical Tool in Theory and Practice. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, (12), 45-61.
Barzani, S., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Pragmatic competence: an imperative competency for a safe and healthy communication. Applied Nanoscience, 1-7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13204-021-02199-3
Banikalef, Maros, and Aladdin. (2014). Linguistic Analysis of Humor in Jordanian Arabic among Young Jordanians Facebookers. Arab World English Journal, 5 (3), 304-318.
Beeman, W. O. (1999). Humour. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9 (1/2), 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.103
Berger, A. A. (1976). Anatomy of the joke. Journal of Communication, 26 (3), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01913.x
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: SAGE Publication.
Dai, J. (2018). Interpretation of Humor between Chinese and Americans from the Angle of Culture in Friends. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(6), 1356-1361. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.27
Fox, A. (2000). Oral and literate culture in England, 1500-1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic an Conversation, Syntax and Semantics, Speech Act. New York: Academic Press.
Hassan, B.E. A. (2013). The Pragmatics of Humor: January 25th Revolution and Occupy Wall Street. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (2), 551-562.
Haven, S. D. (2013). apanese Manzai and Gender : Personal Perspectives from Young Female Performers. Japan Studies: The Frontier, 41-52.
Hirsch, G. (2011). Between irony and humor: A pragmatic model. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19 (3), 530-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.3.07hir
Holmes, J. (2006). Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humor and Gender in the Workplace. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 26-50. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007
Huda, S. (2015). Stuktur, Karakter Tokoh, dan Bahasa dalam Kesenian Tradisional Mamanda. Banjarmasin: Pustaka Banua.
Huda, S. (2016). Mamanda Sebuah Tradisi Daerah Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarmasin: Pustaka Banua.
Ibraheem and Abbas. (2016). Pun and (Un) Intentional Humor. Journal of American Academic Research, 4 (1), 1-18.
Kholidah, Widodo, & Saddhono. (2020). Traditional Stage as a Medium of Social Criticism: The Role of Humor in Ludruk Performance Art. Journal of Critical Reviews, 8 (2), 1-5.
Kotthoff, H. (2006). Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humor. Humor, 19 (3), 271-304. DOI:10.1515/HUMOR.2006.015
Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik (terjemahan M.D.D. Oka). Jakarta: UI Press.
Lynch, O. H. (2002). Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research. Communication Theory, 12 (4), 423-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277.x
Martin & Ford . (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Miles, MB & Huberman. (2007). Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage.
Norrick, N. (2007). Interdiscourse humor: contrast, merging, accommodation. Humor, 20 (4), 389-413. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2007.019
Normasunah. (2020). Analisis Nilai Edukasi Teater pada Naskah Mamanda di Sanggar Pusaka Saijaan Kotabaru. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan STKIP Paris Barantai, 8 (2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v8i2.165
Otiono, N., & Akoma, C. (2021). Oral literary performance in Africa: Beyond text.
Ramsey, M. C. and Meyer, J. C. (2019). Exploring communicative functions of humor: the development and assessment of a new functions of humor scale’. Atlantic Journal of Communication., 27 (1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1540417
Rawski, T. (2016). Laugh and Power. Overview of The Social Functions of Humor. Studia Politologiczne, 41, 240-258.
Reershemius, G. (2012). Research cultures and the pragmatic functions of humor in academic research presentations: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 44 (6-7), 863-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.012
Robert, C. and Wall, J. A. (2019). Humor in civil case mediations: A functional approach. Humour, 32 (3), 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0065
Romero, Eric J. & Kevin W. Cruthirds. (2006). The Use of Humor in the Workplace. Journal Academy of Management, 20 (2), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.20591005
Sastrowardoyo, S., Damono, S. D., & Achmad, A. K. (1985). Oral literature of Indonesia. Jakarta: ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information.
Sheikh, S., & Saleem, S. (2021). Pragmatic Analysis of Short Story "The New Constitution": Finding the Conventional Implicatures. Global Language Review, VI(II), 295-303. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(VI-II).31
Sulistyowati, E. (2016). Eksistensi Mamanda dalam masyarakat Kalimantan Selatan. Lentera: Jurnal Pendidikan, 11 (2), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.33654/jpl.v11i2.410
Taufiq, et al. (2018). A Study of Humor in Bone Regency: A Socio- pragmatic Review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (1), 141-146. : http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0901.18
T Huang and SC Depner. (2016). Pragmatic Functions of Hakka Proverbs: Humor, Praise and Food. Embodiment in language, 21-36.
Welch, A. (2012). The Renaissance epic and the oral past. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wulandari. (2016). Banjar Cultural Values in Mamanda Manuscripts. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pembelajarannya (JBSP), 6 (1), 103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v6i1.3743
Wulandari & Sarbaini. (2014). The Values of Character Education in Conversations at Mamanda Performances. Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pembelajarannya (JBSP), 4 (2), 285-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v4i2.3702
Yuwana, Santosa, & Sumarlam. (2019). New Variation of Indonesian Humor Using Language Experience. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan doi: Pengajarannya, 5 (1), 91. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v5i1.6333
Yuan & Lyu (2022). Speech act matters: Commitment to what's said or what's implicated differs in the case of assertion and promise. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.012
Zhan, L. (2012). Understanding Humor Based on the Incongruity Theory and the Cooperative Principle. Studies in Literature and Language, 4 (2), 94-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.sll.1923156320120402.3521