LITERATURA ORAL DE MAMANDA NA INDONÉSIA: REVISÃO DA FORMA E FUNÇÃO DO HUMOR ATRAVÉS DE UMA PERSPECTIVA PRAGMÁTICA

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/heranca.v6i2.666

Palavras-chave:

Pragmático, Humor, Mamanda

Resumo

Esta pesquisa foi realizada durante oito meses na ilha de Kalimantan do Sul, na Indonésia. Este estudo examina Mamanda. Mamanda é um teatro tradicional de Kalimantan do Sul que ainda sobrevive na era global. Mamanda é apreciada porque é rica em humor que pode entreter todo o público e pode aliviar o cansaço, porque pode convidar ao riso. No entanto, se interpretado de forma mais profunda, o humor tem uma função pragmática a ser transmitida ao ouvinte. Portanto, este estudo examina mais profundamente a função do humor em Mamanda. Este estudo tem como objetivo descrever a forma e a função do humor em Mamanda. Esta pesquisa utiliza o método qualitativo descritivo. Os dados deste estudo, na forma de uma gravação da performance de Mamanda que foi tocada no Mamanda Parade, que é uma série de eventos para comemorar o aniversário da cidade de Banjarmasin, Kalimantan do Sul. Os informantes deste estudo consistiram de vinte pessoas com diferentes formações, todos eles jogadores que desempenharam um papel ativo no show. O método de pesquisa utilizado é qualitativo descritivo para poder descrever os resultados da pesquisa em detalhes usando uma série de frases claras. Os resultados mostraram que havia quatro tipos de humor na mamanda, a saber, humor de linguagem, humor comportamental, humor de fofoca e humor pornográfico. As funções do humor encontradas são função de aconselhamento, função de crítica, função de sátira e função de tolerância.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia Autor

Setya Yuwana Sudikan, Surabaya State University

*

Referências

Abram & Dorothy. (2010). The Trickster and the Veil: Theater, Humor, and Taboo in Creating a Compassionate Cross-Cultural Identity. International Journal of the Humanities, 8(9), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/v08i09/43017

Ahmadi, A. (2021). Teachers as Ethnographers: Narrative Study of Inquiry of Indonesian Teachers Assigned to Teach in Remote Areas. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 115-126. doi: 10.12973/EU-jer.10.1.115

Ahmadi, A. (2022). The Images of Man in Indonesian Literature: Masculinity Psychological Perspective. Masculinities & Social Change, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17583/MCS.9446

Al Shboul, O. K. (2022). Flouting of grice’s maxims by Jordanian speakers in everyday communication. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18. http://jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/3439/1004

Askildson, L. (2005). Effects of Humor in The Language Classroom: Humor as a Pedagogical Tool in Theory and Practice. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, (12), 45-61.

Barzani, S., & Mohammadzadeh, B. (2022). Pragmatic competence: an imperative competency for a safe and healthy communication. Applied Nanoscience, 1-7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13204-021-02199-3

Banikalef, Maros, and Aladdin. (2014). Linguistic Analysis of Humor in Jordanian Arabic among Young Jordanians Facebookers. Arab World English Journal, 5 (3), 304-318.

Beeman, W. O. (1999). Humour. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9 (1/2), 103-106. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.103

Berger, A. A. (1976). Anatomy of the joke. Journal of Communication, 26 (3), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01913.x

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: SAGE Publication.

Dai, J. (2018). Interpretation of Humor between Chinese and Americans from the Angle of Culture in Friends. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(6), 1356-1361. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.27

Fox, A. (2000). Oral and literate culture in England, 1500-1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic an Conversation, Syntax and Semantics, Speech Act. New York: Academic Press.

Hassan, B.E. A. (2013). The Pragmatics of Humor: January 25th Revolution and Occupy Wall Street. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4 (2), 551-562.

Haven, S. D. (2013). apanese Manzai and Gender : Personal Perspectives from Young Female Performers. Japan Studies: The Frontier, 41-52.

Hirsch, G. (2011). Between irony and humor: A pragmatic model. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19 (3), 530-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.3.07hir

Holmes, J. (2006). Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humor and Gender in the Workplace. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 26-50. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.06.007

Huda, S. (2015). Stuktur, Karakter Tokoh, dan Bahasa dalam Kesenian Tradisional Mamanda. Banjarmasin: Pustaka Banua.

Huda, S. (2016). Mamanda Sebuah Tradisi Daerah Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarmasin: Pustaka Banua.

Ibraheem and Abbas. (2016). Pun and (Un) Intentional Humor. Journal of American Academic Research, 4 (1), 1-18.

Kholidah, Widodo, & Saddhono. (2020). Traditional Stage as a Medium of Social Criticism: The Role of Humor in Ludruk Performance Art. Journal of Critical Reviews, 8 (2), 1-5.

Kotthoff, H. (2006). Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humor. Humor, 19 (3), 271-304. DOI:10.1515/HUMOR.2006.015

Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik (terjemahan M.D.D. Oka). Jakarta: UI Press.

Lynch, O. H. (2002). Humorous communication: Finding a place for humor in communication research. Communication Theory, 12 (4), 423-445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00277.x

Martin & Ford . (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Miles, MB & Huberman. (2007). Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage.

Norrick, N. (2007). Interdiscourse humor: contrast, merging, accommodation. Humor, 20 (4), 389-413. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2007.019

Normasunah. (2020). Analisis Nilai Edukasi Teater pada Naskah Mamanda di Sanggar Pusaka Saijaan Kotabaru. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan STKIP Paris Barantai, 8 (2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33659/cip.v8i2.165

Otiono, N., & Akoma, C. (2021). Oral literary performance in Africa: Beyond text.

Ramsey, M. C. and Meyer, J. C. (2019). Exploring communicative functions of humor: the development and assessment of a new functions of humor scale’. Atlantic Journal of Communication., 27 (1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1540417

Rawski, T. (2016). Laugh and Power. Overview of The Social Functions of Humor. Studia Politologiczne, 41, 240-258.

Reershemius, G. (2012). Research cultures and the pragmatic functions of humor in academic research presentations: A corpus-assisted analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 44 (6-7), 863-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.012

Robert, C. and Wall, J. A. (2019). Humor in civil case mediations: A functional approach. Humour, 32 (3), 361-391. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2017-0065

Romero, Eric J. & Kevin W. Cruthirds. (2006). The Use of Humor in the Workplace. Journal Academy of Management, 20 (2), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.20591005

Sastrowardoyo, S., Damono, S. D., & Achmad, A. K. (1985). Oral literature of Indonesia. Jakarta: ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information.

Sheikh, S., & Saleem, S. (2021). Pragmatic Analysis of Short Story "The New Constitution": Finding the Conventional Implicatures. Global Language Review, VI(II), 295-303. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(VI-II).31

Sulistyowati, E. (2016). Eksistensi Mamanda dalam masyarakat Kalimantan Selatan. Lentera: Jurnal Pendidikan, 11 (2), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.33654/jpl.v11i2.410

Taufiq, et al. (2018). A Study of Humor in Bone Regency: A Socio- pragmatic Review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (1), 141-146. : http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0901.18

T Huang and SC Depner. (2016). Pragmatic Functions of Hakka Proverbs: Humor, Praise and Food. Embodiment in language, 21-36.

Welch, A. (2012). The Renaissance epic and the oral past. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Wulandari. (2016). Banjar Cultural Values in Mamanda Manuscripts. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pembelajarannya (JBSP), 6 (1), 103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v6i1.3743

Wulandari & Sarbaini. (2014). The Values of Character Education in Conversations at Mamanda Performances. Jurnal Bahasa Sastra dan Pembelajarannya (JBSP), 4 (2), 285-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v4i2.3702

Yuwana, Santosa, & Sumarlam. (2019). New Variation of Indonesian Humor Using Language Experience. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan doi: Pengajarannya, 5 (1), 91. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v5i1.6333

Yuan & Lyu (2022). Speech act matters: Commitment to what's said or what's implicated differs in the case of assertion and promise. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.012

Zhan, L. (2012). Understanding Humor Based on the Incongruity Theory and the Cooperative Principle. Studies in Literature and Language, 4 (2), 94-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.sll.1923156320120402.3521

Publicado

2023-05-13

Como Citar

Harpriyanti, H., Sudikan, S. Y., & Ahmadi, A. (2023). LITERATURA ORAL DE MAMANDA NA INDONÉSIA: REVISÃO DA FORMA E FUNÇÃO DO HUMOR ATRAVÉS DE UMA PERSPECTIVA PRAGMÁTICA. Herança - Revista De História, Património E Cultura, 6(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.52152/heranca.v6i2.666